JONAH is a Jewish group that offers help and support for Jewish strugglers wishing to leave the gay lifestyle. 
Shalom,
WPSW Staff




 

 

May 17, 2010

Equality for All

 

Mayor Fenti: Everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others

 

By Christopher Doyle

 

Washington, DC's Mayor Adrian Fenty is apologizing for his recognition of the ex-gay community in the District of Columbia. After the mayor's commendation certificate to ex-gay leader Regina Griggs - who has voluntarily served as the executive director for the Washington, DC-based Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays for 10 years - became public last week, a firestorm erupted among anti ex-gay activists who insisted Fenty explain his actions. Although some, such as gay activist Lane Hudson, went even further with their demands.

 

"He doesn't just need to apologize, he needs to rescind the honor that was given to this awful woman, and he needs to condemn what her organization does," said Hudson, who was a staffer for former South Carolina Governor Jim Hodges and was later fired from his position at the Human Rights Campaign after it was revealed that he was the blogger posting former Congressman Mark Foley's e-mails to a 16 year-old House Page.

 

But at a school event, Mayor Fenty fell short of rescinding the honor and condemning the "awful" work of PFOX --"It shouldn't have happened. It happened and it won't ever happen again. We apologize." Asked if he would take back the commendation, Fenty stated: "I haven't talked to anyone about that, but I won't rule that out." 

 

But why exactly is Fenty apologizing? By recognizing Griggs' service to the citizens of the District, some of whom are former homosexuals, the mayor could have set an important precedent of equality, tolerance, and respect for diversity, a platform in which he based his decision to force same-sex marriage on the citizens of DC (who by the way, were never given the opportunity to vote on the measure). 

 

It seems the tone Fenty is really setting is that some groups are more equal than others. His actions continue a trend in the DC government of discrimination towards individuals who have left the homosexual lifestyle. 

 

Lat year PFOX sued the DC Office of Human Rights because it refused to extend protection to former homosexuals under the city's sexual orientation non-discrimination law. The court ruled against the District Government and held that sexual orientation does not require immutable characteristics for protection to be afforded under the law. Thus, former homosexuals are entitled to the same legal protections that gays currently receive and are recognized as a protected class under D.C.'s Human Rights Act. 

 

But instead of acknowledging and respecting the District's laws, Fenty and the city government are succumbing to the political intimidation of militant activists who are now threatening to disinvite Fenty from the Capital Pride Day this summer if he doesn't take back the certificate of appreciation to PFOX. 

 

The Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington DC demanded Fenty "explain" his decision and issue "a clear statement" rejecting the ex-gay movement and describe the "steps" he plans to take to undo the "false impression" that the District government supports former homosexuals. So far, a Fenty spokeswoman called Griggs' award a "staff level error" and apologized as it "runs contrary to the mayor's vision of a more open and inclusive city." One gets the impression that a "more open and inclusive city" must be one free of former homosexuals and those who support the right of self-determination for all individuals. 

 

At least that's what anti ex-gay activist and former communications director for the HRC, Wayne Besen, would have you believe. Besen condemns ex-gay groups such as PFOX as "dangerous." In a recent article posted on Besen's hate website, he commented: "It is outrageous and surreal that one of the most dishonest and divisive organizations in Washington would be honored . . . it is mind-boggling that Griggs has been given this honor." 

 

What really boggles the mind is why Besen and company support the right of individuals to surgically change their gender, yet oppose those who want to change their sexual preference. This is just one of the many debacles that display the unbelievable hypocrisy of gay activists. Tolerance and diversity is demanded, yet rarely extended to those who disagree with their ideology. 

 

As George Orwell suggested, equality is a fleeting animal, and while all animals are equal, some are more equal than others.

 

###

 

Christopher Doyle is a therapist, former homosexual, and officer of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX). 

 

http://pfox-exgays.blogspot.com/2010/05/equality-for-all.html 





by Andrew Tallman

It is core doctrine of pro-gay orthodoxy that homosexuals are born gay. Though science has yet failed to affirm or deny this, the vast majority of gays and their supporters are convinced of it. Sexual orientation is seen as something discovered, not chosen. Instead of debating the merit of this assertion, let’s grant the premise that sexual orientation is determined prior to birth by genetic, gestational or other factors. The question is whether any valid conclusions flow from this. I don’t think so.

Error 1: Sexual orientation cannot change

If present at birth, sexual orientation could come from either biology or psychology. If biological, then a medical procedure may be discovered to alter it. Science gushes with the ability to change things we were born with, especially conditions which past generations considered permanent. We can treat genetic diseases, repair cleft palates, perform height-enhancing surgeries and even perform sex-change operations.

Similarly, if the issue is psychological, treatments may be possible. Many traits and behavioral patterns people believe ought or need to be changed can be adjusted by good counseling or psychopharmacology. Simple induction concludes that if medicine goes looking for a treatment for homosexuality, it might find one.

Many gays will be outraged at this line of reasoning. But why? We’ve been told that homosexuality can’t be a choice—apparently because so few would choose it. Clearly some gays would relish the power to turn their unwanted condition into an optional one. And why shouldn’t other gays be happy for those who would then be truly free to choose? After all, they’re happy for sex-change operations, which make it possible for transgender persons to undo the birth nature they think was mistakenly given them. How can gender be so fixably wrong but sexual orientation so unfixably right?

Error 2: I have no choice about how I behave

There are two kinds of inborn behavioral tendencies: the resistible and the irresistible. Unless we are supposed to believe that homosexuality is so involuntary that every gay sex act is literally a matter of biological determinism, we are left with the more plausible alternative: the desire to have gay sex does not compel anyone to actually ever have gay sex. One may not be able to control who attracts him, but he can certainly control who he has sex with. Consider the non sequitur of a gay man offering to explain last night’s particular sexual encounter by saying, “Well, I was born gay, you know.”

Free will is precisely the capacity to resist a carnal urge. If a gay person can refrain from sex even once, he has shown such free will. Thus, sexual choices devolve to him, not to his inborn disposition. Of course, straight people and gay people alike deny their sexual impulses all the time.

Error 3: If I was born gay, then acting upon it must be good

No one denies that gays have strong desires to be sexual with like-minded, like-bodied others. But strong desires do not justify behavior. Otherwise the study of ethics would be nothing more than the articulation of our impulses.

Some men may be born promiscuous (and perhaps most are), but this doesn’t legitimize adultery (or polygamy, for that matter). Since morality involves precisely the question of which desires are good to act upon, gay behavior cannot be justified merely on the grounds of experienced gay desire.

Error 4: If I was born gay, then this is simply who I am In gay doctrine, being gay isn’t seen as an important part of one’s identity. It’s seen as the definitive center of it. But why should this be so?

I am a Christian, a talk-show host, a baseball fan, right-handed, a philosopher, red-headed, from St. Louis and heterosexual. None of these is the sum or limit of my identity. However, the ones I’ve chosen or chosen to act upon define me far more than those I happened to be born with. Thus, though choosing to have gay sex is certainly a key part of one’s identity, being born with the predilection to do so is not.

Error 5: If I was born gay, God must have made me this way

Of all the untenable conclusions drawn from the born gay premise, this is the most scandalous. Whereas claiming that God has His hand in the creation of every child is uncontroversial, alleging that every element of that child’s physical, emotional and even sexual state at birth are all intended by God is quite another thing. If this pattern of inference were allowed, we would have to believe that God desires every birth defect, handicap, psychological disorder or behavioral tendency we can trace to early childhood. God may allow such things, but that is theological miles from saying that God wanted them.

Yet there is a much deeper blunder embedded in this particular claim. The idea that people have inappropriate inclinations from birth is not unique to the born-gay meme. In fact, it’s so far from unique that it’s actually a cornerstone premise of Christian theology. Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, and Protestants all agree about this one key concept: mankind suffers from original sin, a polluted condition that makes every one of us desire immorality from our birth.

Thus, in a very real sense, one might say that we’re all born gay, although the historically preferred terminology is that we’re all born sinners. We are surely born with corrupt desires, but that doesn’t mean God intended us to act on them.

Although I have serious doubts about the claim that sexual orientation is determined at birth, the issue is largely academic since nothing important hangs on it. Being born gay doesn’t prevent change, prohibit choice, justify behavior, form identity or implicate God. It just means that the moral challenges of the gay person are different from mine.

Copyright © 2008 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AndrewTallman/2008/07/31/five_logical_errors_of_the_born_gay_ideology




by Thom Hunter

What do the gay people in your church look like? Do you spot them by their flamboyant clothing, their mannerisms, their declarations?

When a brother or sister in your church came to you to ask you for your help and support in their personal struggle against homosexuality, what did you do to walk with them? How did you respond the last time this happened to you?
“Oh, we don’t have that problem in our church,” you say?  If yours is a typical Southern Baptist church in Oklahoma, you do. If it is not a problem for Southern Baptists, why did Jimmy Draper lead in the creation of “The Way Out,” SBC’s Task Force on Ministry to Homosexuals, now led by former Texas SBC minister, Bob Stith?

Statistics show that one out of every five church members has a family member or close friend who struggles with homosexuality.
So, again, what do the same-sex attracted people in your church look like? Could they sit there looking like you, dressed like you, acting like you, worshipping in the pew with their spouses and children, or moms and dads, Bibles open, faces forward, smiles on, handshakes offered, singing alongside you in quiet despair? Are they hiding their pain and confusion behind their Sunday smiles?
Like me.

   


Written by: Mike Ensley 

There are many things that can make parents wonder if their child is confused about their sexual identity. It’s true that this struggle is not one teens are eager to share with a parent, or anyone for that matter. In the often fuzzy arena of understanding your teenager, here’s how to recognize the serious warning signs.

Help Them Open Up

The best way to make it more likely your child might share a sexual struggle with you is to respond with an attitude of compassion and understanding whenever these types of issues come up. Your reaction to the subject of homosexuality when it comes up in conversation, on TV or through other relationships sends your children a message about whether you are a safe person to confide in.

Reacting with a grimace and saying, “That’s disgusting!” communicates hostility. Just consider: would you feel comfortable sharing a personal temptation with someone you knew thought “those people” were a disgusting abomination? Probably not.

Usually, people respond with hostility or anger to this issue because it seems so confusing and overwhelming. It’s not difficult, though, to overcome our fears of this issue by educating ourselves with a compassionate, Biblical standpoint. Exodus has some great resources to help you do just that.

When you can talk about homosexuality with calmness, knowledge and compassion, your children are more likely to talk to you about it. Basic truths to stick to are understanding that 1) nobody chooses to struggle with homosexuality, 2) a person isn’t guilty just because they’re tempted, 3) homosexual behavior is no worse than any other sin, 4) people can find freedom and healing in Christ.

Still, there is no way to guarantee that they will be confident enough to come directly to you. So you do want to know what to look for.

Sure Signs

If your son or daughter has been viewing homosexual pornography or visiting gay, lesbian or bisexual chat rooms online, that is a pretty solid sign that they are dealing with serious sexual identity issues. When confronted about this kind of involvement, most teens will try to dodge with an excuse like “I was just curious” or “I was trying to understand a friend better.”

Please understand that your child probably feels a deep sense of shame about their struggle, and whatever level of behavior they’ve become involved in. Whenever their struggle “comes out,” it’s crucial to reaffirm how much you love them, and that you do not see them any differently.

Other signs you ought to be concerned by include consistent and overt gender-atypical behavior (opposite-sex clothing, mannerisms, etc.), and unhealthy, overly-emotional attachments to a single friend of the same sex

Addressing It

When you observe these types of things, don’t be quick to label it as homosexuality. Simply address what you have observed and ask them questions about it. Don’t assume something is there if it is not plainly true–that can make things worse.

For instance, don’t say: “You and Sarah act like a couple of lesbians. You aren’t doing that, are you?” or, “Son, why do you act so feminine? You don’t want people to think you’re gay.”

Addressing without assuming would sound more like this: “I’ve noticed you and Sarah spend so much time together, you’re neglecting your other friends. Do you think that’s a good idea?” or, “Son, it seems like you aren’t really into hanging out with the guys. Did something happen?”

It is best for your response to communicate that you care about their well-being, and offer them opportunities to share their feelings. Plus if they already know that homosexuality doesn’t make you totally blow up, you’ve created a much more positive environment for them.

Not So Sure Signs

There are also sometimes “yellow flags” that go up for parents, but aren’t necessarily a sign your child struggles with SSA. For instance, if they come home from school with a book, flier or brochure mentioning homosexuality; that’s not necessarily a sign.

Material addressing homosexuality is becoming more and more common in the public school system. Your children will most likely receive information or materials on the subject more than once. Don’t assume they are struggling just because of something like this (pornographic material is another issue altogether) but take the opportunity to talk openly with them about issues of sexuality and see what they’re thinking.

Gay clubs (commonly called “GSA” or Gay-Straight Alliance) are also common on public school campuses. These clubs are not only geared towards students who are gay-identified, but they also encourage non-gay students to become “allies,” or people who are supportive of gay issues and/or making schools safer.

If your child joins the local GSA, it doesn’t necessarily mean they struggle–but you may want to have a talk with them and find out where they’re at in their understanding of sexual morality. These clubs, while exemplifying some good motives like stopping bullying, also promote materials and morals you will be strongly opposed to (see the article GLSEN and Its Influence on Children).

Try not to get into a confrontation with your child, but do your best to have open dialog about what they’re hearing about these issues and what they think.

They probably just want to show their support for making schools safe. Let them know there are great ways for Christian students to stand against bullying and harassment while still speaking the truth about sexuality, like the Allies, Too campaign